Skip to main content

Primary Research · 2017

International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine

Kreider RB, Kalman DS, Antonio J, et al. · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2017

Key finding

Reviews 500+ studies and concludes creatine monohydrate is the most effective ergogenic nutritional supplement for high-intensity exercise and lean body mass, with an excellent safety profile across populations.

A

85/100

Methodology review

Formulate's editorial read of the paper's design, scope, and limitations.

Landmark replicatedLarge n

Critique

As a position stand synthesizing over 500 primary studies, its grade reflects the aggregate evidence it summarizes — and the creatine literature is unusually deep. Creatine monohydrate has been replicated across decades, populations, and research groups. The main caveat is that ISSN member authors often have industry relationships with sports nutrition companies, and conclusions about safety in vulnerable populations (adolescents, renal disease, pregnancy) rely on extrapolation rather than direct trials.

What would be more convincing

A Cochrane systematic review conducted by independent methodologists would add a final confirmatory tier. For most purposes, though, the creatine evidence base is already among the most mature in any supplement category.

Reviewed 2026-04-21 · Opinion based on verifiable facts in the published paper.

About the supplement

Creatine

Dose · mechanism · evidence grade · safety →

Read the paper

Open on PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28615996/

Cited in 6 guides

About this page

Formulate maintains a registry of clinical studies cited across its guides and evidence grades. This page links the study metadata to the content that cites it — one canonical entry per landmark study.

The full citation chain is public so readers can verify claims without hunting through individual guide pages. Browse all cited studies →

Note: Study summaries on this page are editorial interpretations of the research. Always consult the primary source before drawing clinical conclusions.