Skip to main content

Primary Research · 2012

A prospective, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of safety and efficacy of a high-concentration full-spectrum extract of ashwagandha root in reducing stress and anxiety in adults

Chandrasekhar K, Kapoor J, Anishetty S · Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 2012

Key finding

60-day double-blind RCT (n=64) using 300mg KSM-66 ashwagandha twice daily significantly reduced perceived stress (PSS) and serum cortisol vs placebo.

C

58/100

Methodology review

Formulate's editorial read of the paper's design, scope, and limitations.

Small nShort durationSurrogate endpointIndustry-adjacentSingle-center

Critique

Often cited as proof ashwagandha reduces stress, but the methodology limits how much weight this single trial can carry. n=64 is modest for detecting the reported effect size. 60 days is a short window for chronic stress claims. Outcomes were a subjective scale (PSS-14) plus a single morning serum cortisol draw — morning cortisol is highly variable day-to-day and is not a robust biomarker of chronic stress compared to diurnal curves or hair cortisol. The KSM-66 extract is manufactured by Ixoreal Biomed, whose involvement appears across many subsequent ashwagandha trials, complicating independent replication. The direction of results has been echoed in later trials, but any one small trial of this design is weak evidence on its own.

What would be more convincing

A 12-week pre-registered RCT with n≥200, independently funded, using diurnal or hair cortisol alongside PSS-14, with a pre-specified MCID on the PSS, would be materially more convincing.

Reviewed 2026-04-21 · Opinion based on verifiable facts in the published paper.

About the supplement

Ashwagandha

Dose · mechanism · evidence grade · safety →

Read the paper

Open on PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23439798/

Cited in 5 guides

About this page

Formulate maintains a registry of clinical studies cited across its guides and evidence grades. This page links the study metadata to the content that cites it — one canonical entry per landmark study.

The full citation chain is public so readers can verify claims without hunting through individual guide pages. Browse all cited studies →

Note: Study summaries on this page are editorial interpretations of the research. Always consult the primary source before drawing clinical conclusions.