Skip to main content

Primary Research · 2021

Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?

Antonio et al. · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2021

Key finding

Systematic review comparing monohydrate to alternative forms — no meaningful difference in muscle creatine uptake.

Read the paper

Open on PubMed

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33557850/

Cited in 1 guide

About this page

Formulate maintains a registry of clinical studies cited across its guides and evidence grades. This page links the study metadata to the content that cites it — one canonical entry per landmark study.

The full citation chain is public so readers can verify claims without hunting through individual guide pages. Browse all cited studies →

Note: Study summaries on this page are editorial interpretations of the research. Always consult the primary source before drawing clinical conclusions.